✅ FINAL NOTES — Dark Places Ecology, Place, and the Metaphysics of Horror Fiction
Tags: source // horror // storytelling
Related Topics:
2015-07-10 - Dark Places Ecology, Place, and the Metaphysics of Horror Fiction
Details
- Source PDF: PDF++ Dark Places _ Ecology, Place, and the Metaphysics of Horror Fiction (miranda-7012).pdf
- Page numbers were off by ONE so double check if you re-ingest more annotations later!!!
- they are correct as of now
Key words to highlight:
- Age of Asymmetry
- aesthetic
- alterioembodiment (Page 16)
- alterioperception (Page 16)
- analog
- Anthropocene
- anticipatory haunting // haunting
- architecture // architectural
- audio // audible // sound
- bitter nostalgia
- capitalist
- creepypastas
- copypastas
- cursed media
- Da-Sein
- dead malls
- Déjà vu
- diegetic uncertainty // limited information
- doubles // doppelgängers
- ecology (Page 17)
- ecocide (Page 17)
- ecological nihilism (Page 17)
- ecological philosophy (Page 15)
- ecosystems
- transitional ecosystems (Page 14)
- hard-to-see-through "water"
- hauntology // haunting
- digital hauntology
- hauntological curses
- heimlich // unheimlich
- horror
- analog horror
- found footage
- cosmic horror // cosmos
- internet horror // internet-based horror // online horror
- open source horror // open source
- analog horror
- hypermediacy
- irreductionism // reductive // reduction
- Jacques Derrida’s earlier concepts of ‘trace’ and ‘différance’
- liminal // liminal spaces
- materialised memory
- maze // labyrinths
- medium
- mimetic
- modernist // modernism
- monsters // monstrous arrivant
- ”natural”
- ”Natural”
- nihilism // nihilist
- non-Euclidean geometry and space-time (Page 10)
- non-Euclidean or Reimanian space (Page 10)
- open source
- produsage
- prosumer // user-producers
- realism // reality
- meta-natural realism
- the naturalistic real
- the “real” Real
- transcendental realism
- senses // perceptions // cognitions // faculties
- siren call of the void
- spaces // places // environments
- ”stain of time“
- threat // dangers
- threshold // transitional
- Jacques Derrida’s earlier concepts of ‘trace’ and ‘différance’
- transmedia
- Umsein
- utopia // utopianism
- weird
- the weird real (Page 12 + 15)
- Weird fiction (Page 4)
- weird literature (Page 3)
- window
atmospheric words:
- alienation
- ambiguity // ambiguous
- anticipation // the anticipatory pull
- apprehensive // apprehension
- atmospheric // atmosphere
- authentic // authenticity
- bitter nostalgia
- blood-curdling scream
- blurring of boundaries // blur // blurred // boundaries // boundary
- creepy
- delusion // deluded
- disconcertingly tall
- disorientation
- disturbing
- dread
- dream // dreamlike // dream-like
- eerie // eeriness
- emptiness // empty
- ephemeral
- existential nihilism
- familiarity // familiar
- freeze // frozen // paralysis
- horrifying
- incompleteness
- lost // lost hope // futility // futile
- mystery
- palpable
- revulsion
- suspension // suspense
- tension
- terrifying
- uncomfortable
- unease
- unsettling
- vulnerability
- a sense of immediacy, a higher proximity to the threat
- watched
HOW this horror genre works
- altering // transforming
- anthropomorphically
- attunement
- confront
- constant hiss
- constant room tone
- contingent
- dark // darkness
- deformation
- dissonance // dissonant // cognitive dissonance (Page 12)
- disrupting // disruption
- distort // distorted // distortion
- echoes
- the gap
- grainy
- hard-to-see-through "water,"
- highly specific
- in-between
- incomprehensible
- innovative // deeply innovative // innovation // innovate // innovated
- inscrutable
- isolation
- juxtaposition // opposed // opposition // beyond
- knife-edge sharpness
- lack // absence // absent // negative
- lo-fi
- long sightlines
- low ceilings
- monotony // monotone
- non-Euclidean geometry and space-time (Page 10)
- non-Euclidean or Reimanian space (Page 10)
- obscure
- occult
- order
- other // otherness
- reason
- repetition // repetitive // repeat
- retro
- shadows // shadow-laden
- spatial
- story // stories // storytelling
- strangeness
- temporal
- thin voices
- tinny resonances
- uncanny
- unknown
- unnamable
- unnatural
- vast
- veered
- warbling synths
Sources mentioned:
Summary
This article by Brad Tabas argues that horror fiction, particularly the work of Poe, Lovecraft, and VanderMeer, offers a unique and under appreciated form of ’weird realism’ that is highly relevant to ecological criticism. Rather than relying on stock tropes, these authors use horror to explore the gap between the 'natural' (our human-centered representations) and the 'real' (the autonomous, often alien, world beyond our perception). Tabas contends that this weird realism helps us confront the unsettling realities of the Anthropocene, where our ordinary ways of perceiving the environment are increasingly inadequate. By disrupting our sense of being 'at home' in the world, horror fiction encourages a deeper, more humble, and ethical attunement to the environment, acknowledging that the world is radically independent of human design.
ALT SUMMARY: This article explores the intersection of horror fiction, ecology, and place, arguing that horror is a form of 'weird realism' that offers a deeper, more honest engagement with the environment than traditional nature writing. By analyzing the works of Edgar Allan Poe, H.P. Lovecraft, and Jeff VanderMeer, the author contends that horror fiction disrupts our anthropocentric, naturalist assumptions, revealing a reality that is independent of human perception and often horrifyingly alien. The note highlights how these authors use 'weird' topographies and the deformation of space to challenge our sense of being at home in the world, ultimately suggesting that horror can foster a more humble, x-ray attentiveness to the complexities of the Anthropocene.
- [I] world-shattering tension (Page 17) //
Transcription
✅ notes pulled! // Page 1
- [I] The world is increasingly unthinkable—a world of planetary disasters, emerging pandemics, tectonic shifts, strange weather, and the threat of extinction.
- [*] Horror fiction is deeply concerned with ambiance, place, and environment. . . . While lesser horror uses stock scenarios (haunted houses, misty graveyards), ”most of the finest pieces of horror writing explore the expression of place in highly specific and deeply innovative ways” (Page 1) // purple highlight
- the backrooms are a perfect example of this!
✅ notes pulled! // Page 2
- [I] weird literature can help us to develop an utterly different, if not less important, critical conception of the role of literature as prompting us to think deeply about reality of the places that we inhabit. (Page 2) // purple highlight
- And what might the backrooms imply about the (memory) spaces we inhabit?
-
[I]
Surely the excuse for this oversight would somehow involve the notion of the natural and some form ofinsistence that horror does not deal with the natural but rather with the supernatural, as it is of nature and naturalismthat the editors of these volumes speak when they explainthe general literary strategies at workin the texts covered in their volumes.But as we will see, this overlooks and misunderstands the functioning of explorations of place in horror. (Page 2) -
[I] The Natural: The Natural, on the other hand, we might take to refer to this “outside” as it appears to reflecting subjects via the mediation of our cultural, scientific, and linguistic representations. (Page 2)
-
[I] The point is not that there is there is no ultimate autonomous reality outside of our heads, but rather that the ideas and representations that we have about this reality, what we call “nature,” are not identical with the real, and in taking them to be identical we precisely occult the real and so miss out on a deeper and perhaps more satisfying form of realism. (Page 2) // green highlight
- This is a very interesting rabbit hole
-
[I] In other words, the nature that we think, and think that we see, is a deformed version of the real, transformed by complex perceptual and cognitive processes. As Graham Harman has somewhat paradoxically put it : “nature is not natural and can never be naturalized” (Page 2) // purple highlight
- Our faculties determine our reality.
- Double slit experiment.
- [i] transcendental realism (Page 2)
✅ notes pulled! // Page 3
- [*] Weirdly enough, this meta-natural realism, not in its reality but in its expression, often seems to evoke what we call the supernatural, if indeed we understand this word to designate something that stands opposed to, or beyond, the Natural. (Page 3) //
- my thoughts: Dissonance and incongruence between our minds and the outer world as it appears.
- [*] The genius of horror and the supernatural precisely lies in its refusal to accept the Natural as ultimate or identical with reality. (Page 3) // green highlight
- [I] Skipped: Weird fiction (a term that I will here use as synonymous with horror, after the habit established by Lovecraft and S.T. Joshi) is weird or veered precisely as an expression of fidelity towards the real as that which demands a veering of, or deformation of, the natural towards what Jeff VanderMeer might call weird naturalism. (Page 3) // purple highlight
- [p] TL;DR: “Weird fiction is an expression of fidelity towards the real, demanding a deformation of the natural.“
- [i] supernatural horror (Page 3)
- [i] The natural: the world outside of our minds
- [i] The Natural: the world (as we individually and collectively) perceive it inside of our minds
- [*] few will deny that their senses have ever achieved such knife-edge sharpness as they do in moments when they confront the terrifying and unknown (Page 3) //
- my thoughts: This slaps.
- [I] attention to otherness orients us towards the opening of an authentically ethical relationship to our environments, since the otherness that we are attending to echoes the strangeness of other human beings that we normally attribute to their recognition-demanding capacity for spontaneous, and moral, actions (Page 3) //
- [I] it is the gap between the real and the natural that opens the space for a criticism that does more than envision literature simply as a sweetened means for delivering the dry truths of scientific discoveries, but rather as an art that alludes to an all-important yet obscure reality to which we must learn to attend (Page 3) //
- my thoughts: The science/function of reality is not as interesting/compelling as delivering the same truths in storytelling form.
- [i] Weird realism involves the insistence that there is a reality outside and beyond the senses, while at the same time claiming that this reality can, in occult and incomprehensible ways, interfere with and challenge our reality, altering it and transforming it in sometimes inscrutable, contingent, or weirdly super-Natural (my note: supernatural) ways. (Page 3) // green highlight
- [i] Skipped: Therefore we are forced to see the world around us as radically independent of our own will and designs (Page 3) // green highlight
✅ notes pulled! // Page 4
- [i] the real, while never fully present to our minds or our senses, appears to us as dark, weird, veered, or uncanny (Page 4) //
- [I] Reckoning with the fact that reality is sometimes stranger than fiction, however, sometimes means accepting that the actual can be confounded with the delusions of an unhealthy mind. (Page 4) //
- [I] These are all, admittedly, gaps that are glimpsed between the Nature of science and the Nature of the lifeworld of ordinary perception, but they do remind us of the horrifying uncanniness of the cosmos, and the complicity of our ordinary ways of perceiving in the perpetuation of our collective ecocide. (Page 4) //
-
[I] (Partially) Skipped:The product of these weird expressions of place is not knowledge, as in the case of science or naturalistic writing, but rather attunement, a straining after or intensified awareness of the presence of others that also relate, beyond our perceptions and cognitions, amongst themselves, and so form places. (Page 4)
- my thoughts: Skipped:This (incl. the bullet below) is why the backrooms works so well!
-
[I] Skipped: VanderMeer, explores more profoundly the interest of weird writing for thinking about and living in the increasingly horrifying and uncanny age that is the Anthropocene. (Page 4) //
✅ notes pulled! // Page 5
- [I] (Partially) Skipped:Poe's "The Fall of the House of Usher" presents an encounter with reality, not a dream or delusion. Poe is quite specific about the time and the ambiance, the specifics of his experience. (Page 5)
- [*] The same inversion is suggested by the figure of the veil, a trope that, as Pierre Hadot has explored, was long used in alchemical and other occult circles to refer to the concealed secret orders of the natural world. (Page 5) //
- [I] human awareness of the alien nature of objects, the sensation that “the objects around them were one thing and that they were another,” led to the birth of horror (Page 5) //
- my thoughts: Backrooms is returning to the elemental basics of horror.
- [I] Objects slip through our fingers in both a literal and theoretical sense, and when they do they reveal more of themselves to us, present us with new depths and concealed aspects, aspects of the object independent from any theoretical or practical grasp that we might have of them, but which might matter with respect to the combinations that they can compose. (Page 5-6) //
-
[I] Skipped: The dread that pervades the narrator is not presented as a dream or delusion, but precisely as an encounter with reality. (Page 5) //
-
[I] Skipped: there are “combinations of very simple natural objects which have the power of thus affecting us, still the analysis of this power lies among considerations beyond our depth” (Page 5) //
✅ notes pulled! // Page 6
- [I] Even what seems most present to us, the objects around us, our surroundings, are apt to dupe us, to seem one thing and to actually be another. (Page 6) //
- my thoughts: Our minds can play tricks on us.
- [I] No object is ever revealed to us in its totality, each has another perspective from which it might be viewed, or a concealed otherness, and that is only speaking of the object from the viewpoint of a vision without dynamism. (Page 6) //
- [*] Nature does not like to be observed, and likes that we should be her fools and playmates (Page 6) //
- my thoughts: cosmic horror
- [I] (Partially) Skipped: an account of reality in which what we call the natural is but one interpretation of past possibility, and not in any way an expression of the ultimate nature of the real. (Page 6) //
- my thoughts: The backrooms misremembering itself is only one interpretation of reality, albeit somewhat seemingly memorized w/ people but yet somehow not levels.
- [i] psychological horror (Page 6)
- the psychological aspects of horror (Page 8) //
- [i] In cosmic horror, madness is generated by a violence exercised by “outer, unknown forces” (Lovecraft 1973, 15)
- (Page 6-7)
- [I] Skipped: “no object ever discovers, by the qualities which appear to the senses, either the causes which produced it, or the effects which will arise from it” (Page 6) //
✅ notes pulled! // Page 7
-
[I] Skipped: not so much a world haunted by human ghosts, but a world in which rocks and stones have a kind of “sentience,” a certain spontaneity that allows them to act outside of the conditioning of natural law, just as humans conceived as ethical agents are supposedly capable of doing. (Page 7) //
-
[I] Skipped: Lovecraft, (Non)locality, and Madness.
-
[I] Skipped: dedicated to disrupting our normal sense of being at home in the world (Page 7) //
-
[I] Skipped: the mind is here introduced in such a way as to render the real all the more horrifying, since the mind is seen as blocking us from seeing what is actually there (Page 7-8) //
✅ notes pulled! // Page 8
- [I] In Lovecraft, Madness is thus the testament and seal of having experienced the real. (Page 8) //
-
[I] Skipped: the conundrum of whether Walter Gilman’s dreams cause the fever or the fever the dreams, but we are then told that both alternatives are insignificant (Page 8) //
-
[I] Skipped: Moreover, as an animate being, the place is unaccountable, granted will, spontaneity, and the capacity to be acknowledged and to demand acknowledgment. (Page 8) //
-
[I] Skipped: erroneously familiar (Page 8) //
-
[I] Skipped: As a means of expressing place, then, Lovecraft constantly steps over the boundaries of our perception, vaguely hinting to us the details of an outside or ultimate reality, while at the same time rendering us acutely aware of the finitude of our grasp on the real. In Lovecraft’s early work, such as for instance in “The Music of Erich Zann,” the relationship between mind and world, text and real, is articulated through a confounding of our sense of place and time. (Page 8) //
✅ notes pulled! // Page 9
- [I] It seems that we are encountering things that shatter all knowable categories. (Page 9) //
- [I] the ways in which our scientific knowledge of these deeper dimensions of reality already humiliate us, … correspond to the limited and limiting spatial and temporal capacities of our brains. (Page 9-10) //
-
[I] Skipped: “street at the threshold” (Rue d’Au Seuil), a name which perfectly corresponds to the metaphysical status of the place named both in terms of what it suggests and what it does not confirm, namely the real status of the Rue d’Au Seuil as a liminal place, something that hovers between being simply unreal and the impossible coming-to-presence of the ultimately-extensionless real. (Page 9) //
-
[I] Skipped: a place on the threshold of being on the threshold (Page 9) //
- my thoughts: Liminal ^ 2
-
[I] Skipped: “the geometry of the place was all wrong,” (Page 9) //
-
[I] Skipped: we find references to non-Euclidean geometry and space-time, weird theories explaining: “possible freakish curvatures in space, and of Theoretical points of approach or even contact between our part of the cosmos and various other regions as distant as the farthest stars or the transgalactic gulfs themselves—or even as fabulously remote as the tentatively conceivable cosmic units beyond the whole Einsteinian space-time continuum.” (363) (Page 9) //
- my thoughts: Non-intuitive geometry.
-
[I] Skipped: Weird fiction must always go beyond the logical and the known, and that is to say beyond mathematics and science.4 (Miranda, Page 9) // (Page 9)
### ✅ notes pulled! // Page 10
- [*] we are possessed by nature, and that nature, for want to a better word, is possessed, ready to annihilate us for the unthinking ways in which we have tried to impose our mark upon the real (Page 10) //
- my thoughts: The backrooms are hostile to us and trying to kill us.
-
[I] it is easy to feel lulled into thinking that we know this place, that we are actually travelling through the New England that we know, a world with which we are familiar and at home. But as the description goes on, we seem to cross over a threshold (Page 10) //
-
[I] Example: Skipped: “The summits are too rounded and symmetrical to give a sense of comfort and naturalness” (Page 10) //
-
[I] Skipped: Here what is stretched is not so much language—it is possible to imagine mountains as rounded—but precisely our pretension to know the world (Page 10) //
-
[I] Example: Skipped: as absurd as would be a field of quintessentially identical dandelions, perfectly similar maple leaves, or ontologically indifferent cattle (Page 10) //
-
[I] Skipped: Therein is expressed one of the terrors of our current situation, … our awareness of the ways in which the limits of our minds hinder our every attempt to master or rationally model the world around us. (Page 10) //
✅ notes pulled! // Page 11
- [I] alien landscape (Page 11) //
- [I] What, after all, does it mean for something to “not be supposed” to be someplace ? (Page 11) //
- [I] “The tower, which was not supposed to be there, plunges into the earth in a place just before the black pine forest begins to give way to swamp and then the reeds and wind-gnarled trees of the marsh flats. Beyond the marsh flats and the natural canals lies the ocean and, a little farther down the coast, a derelict lighthouse.” (3) (Page 11)
-
[I] Skipped: Some types of omissions made my mind itch as much as more explicit offerings. One journal, half-destroyed by the damp, focused solely on the qualities of a kind of thistle with a lavender blossom that grew in the hinterlands between forest and swamp. Page after page described encountering first one specimen of this thistle and then another, along with minute details about the insects and other creatures that occupied that microhabitat. In no instance did the observer stray more than a foot or two from a particular plant, and at no point, either, did the observer pull back to provide a glimpse of base camp or their own life. After a while, a kind of unease came over me as I began to perceive a terrible presence hovering in the background of these entries. I saw the Crawler or some surrogate approaching in that space just beyond the thistle, and the single focus of the journal keeper a way of coping with that horror. An absence is not a presence, but still with each new depiction of a thistle, a shiver worked deeper and deeper into my spine. - (VanderMeer 2014 b, 114) (Page 11) //
- my thoughts: Distracting ourselves from the looming horrors by preoccupying ourselves with the familiar.
-
[I] Skipped: to look too closely at things, to discover their weirdness and terror, not their familiarity and presence (Page 11) //
- my thoughts: Much like the people in the backrooms.
-
[I] Skipped: the notion of erasure, that cultivates omissions and allusions ; writing that reminds us of dimensions of place that are absent from both the setting and from ordinary perception, and which yet constitute something like the dark presences so powerfully evoked by Lovecraft. (Page 11) //
✅ notes pulled! // Page 12
- [I] After all, a tower is athing that extends up out of the ground, and yet this ‘tower’ is said to plunge into theearth. The tower would thus seem to be inverted, indeed to be something other than atower, perhaps to be a tunnel, which is indeed what some of the other characters in the story do call it, albeit not the narrator. (Page 12) //
- [*] whatever it is does not fit with any of our names or descriptions, that it is a thing with no proper analogue in our language and no proper precursor in our past perceptions (Page 12) //
- my thoughts: It's like asking someone who's never seen a dog to draw a dog. It’s indescribable & incomprehensible
- [I] Instead they render the entire place a zone of disorientation, though this disorientation might be said to spring not from an absence of reality, but from an excess of the real. (Page 12) //
- my thoughts: Too much familiarity = horror.
- [I] This in turn suggests to us that the “real” Real is beyond that which is presented to us, situated in a withdrawn place that cannot be reached via the categories of language or even the categories of our perception. (Page 12) //
- my thoughts: Hence, the uncanny valley effect.
- [I] the consummate inadequacy (Page 12)
- [I] (Partially) Skipped: We have a description that seems to depict the object as it is seen, but then that description seems to break down into mere metaphors, as if the object itself were deconstructing our categories : “The curling filaments were all packed very close together and rising out from the wall. A loamy smell came from the words along with an underlying hint of rotting honey. This miniature forest swayed, almost imperceptibly, like sea grass in agentle ocean current” (24). Unlike ordinary nature writing, which in Tom Lyons's words brings about a “lifting or clarifying of perception” of the environment (Lyons 25), moving from confused observations to a precise understanding of the organization of ecosystems, this writing seems to make our perception at once muddier and more profound. In this case, the more vividly we seem to see the thing, the less sense that we have of its being clearly nameable or even identifiable. (Page 12) //
-
[I] Skipped: But this absence of the tower from the map does not annul the mystery of the object, but rather heightens it, prompting us to wonder why and how the tower was not included on maps beforehand. (Page 12) //
-
[I] Skipped: cumulative confusion (Page 12)
-
[I] Skipped: only that our versions of it are somehow pale reflections of its reality (Page 12) //
-
[I] Skipped: from a failure of the categories that structure and order our perceptions to bring the objects into full phenomenal presence (Page 12) //
-
[I] Skipped: She notes that the entities that they are composed of “would have looked to the layperson like rich green fernlike moss” but she quickly makes clear that to her trainedview they are “in fact” “probably” something else, “a type of fungi or other eukaryoticorganism” (24). (Page 12)
✅ notes pulled! // Page 13
- [*] Yet what scientists do to create order is to impose limits, separating the known and knowable from the unknown and irrelevant. (Page 13) //
- my thoughts: ASYNC
- [I] a “mandala,” a circle in the forest in order to make sense of the larger forest itself (Page 13) //
- my thoughts: The levels in the labyrinth contain multitudes. Each level = circle/mandala.
- [I] Where is the absolute point of transition ? (Page 13) //
- my thoughts: The threshold.
- [I] ecosystems that are somehow of two kinds at once and which are neither at once, ecosystems that confront us with the multiplicity of the real in its disorder rather than a reduction of this real into order via artificial delimitations and interpretative frameworks.
- Everything Everywhere All at Once
-
[I] Skipped: While it may be well and true that conceptual clarity is achieved through such delimitation, it is also true that limits marking place are always arbitrary. (Page 13) //
-
[I] Skipped: strives to speak about this world while perpetually reminding us that what we see is a reduction of the real to an instrumentalized and partial version of the same (Page 13) //
-
[I] Skipped: the pure if also obscure presence (Page 13) //
-
[I] Skipped: aptly named “destroyer of worlds” starfish (Page 13)
✅ notes pulled! // Page 14
[*] “And if I kept looking, I knew that ultimately I would have to admit I knew less than nothing about myself as well, whether that was a lie or the truth” (175) (Page 14) //
- my thoughts: This quote sums up the pivotal revelation that Clark has at the dinner table when he asks: 'how do I stop?' (human existence)
- [I] The encounter with the weird real thus brings about the dissolution of the subject, a collapse or foundering of self-knowledge. But if this is all the case, then the weird real also makes us conscious, as in the lines above, of the fact of our consciousness as reductive. It is hence in itself a thing of danger to our ecological well being, since it is productive of an illusory knowledge of place, where the reality itself lies further outside. (Page 15) //
- my thoughts: Cosmic horror 101
- my thoughts: This is deep & meta AF
- [I] When we strive to render ourselves conscious of the ways in which we are bound up in this world, … , we may feel that we have replaced a more typical or alienated opposition between subjects and objects with one in which humans and things are tightly bound in relationships of mutual co-implication. (Page 14) //
-
[I] Skipped: It is rare, almost impossible, to have these sorts of breakdowns without a destroyer of worlds, an alien thing that ruptures our tranquility and finally shatters our subjectivity, or, perhaps, what would be better put, our Da-Sein, our being there. (Page 14) //
-
[I] Skipped: we recognize that we do not share, that we cannot share, and that therefore we must weirdly or awkwardly co-inhabit with (Page 14) //
-
[I] the work of art, that thing that creates a tear or gap or Riß in being. It is, for horror, that zone in the interior of the enchanted circle, that weird place where all that is horrifying happens (Page 14) //
-
[I] Skipped: The word Dasein, for Heidegger, is synonymous with the being of the human, but it also articulates a sense of being that is always situated, always in a place, and only capable of coming to knowledge of the self in combination with a coming to awareness of the nature of that place.
-
[I] Skipped: Subjectivity cannot be grasped independently of a larger structure that encompasses other subjects as well as the objects and events of the world. It is, we can say, in the dense structure of place that subjectivity is embedded and, in as much as subjectivity is only to be found within such a structure, so there is a necessary dependence of subjectivity on the other elements within that structure and on the structure as it whole.” (Page 14) //
-
[i] Skipped: ecological philosophy: Its main concerns centre on the practice and application of ecology, its moral issues, and the intersectionality between the position of humans and other entities.[1] This topic also overlaps with metaphysics, ontology, and epistemology, for example, as it attempts to answer metaphysical, epistemic and moral issues surrounding environmental ethics and public policy.
-
[I] Skipped: we may feel that we have replaced a more typical or alienated opposition between subjects and objects with one in which humans and things are tightly bound in relationships of mutual co-implication.
-
[I] Skipped: we can attain such an attunement that “our bodies resonate with one another and with the other rhythms that surround us” (Page 14) //
-
[I] Skipped: Yet at best, such an attunement amounts to so perfect an integration into the world of the “there” that the withdrawn or obscure is forgotten. We might have become the world, but the world here is only the one that we encounter, and it is thus conditioned and diminished by the limits of human embodiment and human subjectivity. (Page 14) //
- my thoughts:
Everything begins to melt together. - Everything Everywhere All At Once
- my thoughts:
✅ notes pulled! // Page 15
- [*] Example: when visiting Chernobyl, found himself discombobulated, as if nature itself was going on normally despite the disaster … (emphasizing) that nature has the power to reclaim the world after we are gone, but a more uncanny point might be made here, namely that the world we live in is getting ever weirder, the disconnections between our felt experiences of places and their deeper realities ever more gaping. (Page 15-16) //
-
[I] Skipped: Yet there are other bodies, and as such other sensual worlds, parts of the world that are real without being us. (Page 15) //
-
[I] Skipped: Perhaps the limits of the naturalistic real must correspond to the limits of our bodies, but the bounds of the real as such must include the possibility of thinking other sorts of embodied worlds as sharing the background with us. It is this possibility of experiencing what might be described as alterioembodiment and alterioperception that occurs in Area X (Page 15) //
-
[I] Not only does the encounter with the place break down the subject, drawing the subject into a madness that derives from contact with the real (as in Lovecraft), but the subject is also reconstituted in a new way, and in a new relationship to the real, because the being there of the subject is different, diffused outside of the body and into the environment, such that the sensual contact with the world, the being-there, is not situated within one body but diffused amongst multiple differently embodied bodies, while at the same time remaining tied to the original body, only now in a risible or weird way. (Page 15) //
- my thoughts: This is perfectly exemplified in the dissonant ending scene of the backrooms.
-
[i] Skipped: alteriosensuality (Page 15)
-
[i] Skipped: Da-Sein (Page 15)
- The still lifes!
-
[i] Skipped: Umsein (Page 15)
-
[I] Such a weird subjectivity is of course disorienting, rather than seeing or feeling oneself as discrete and yet connected to a pole or a there within being, this Umself embraces multiple and incommensurate places at once, experiencing at one and the same time limits and worlds beyond those limits, void and fullness madly and dissonantly overlapping. (Page 15) //
- my thoughts: This sums it up best IMO
-
[i] Skipped: the Anthropocene (Page 15 + 18)
-
[I] Skipped: “It was a lovely neighborhood in a quiet residential area, with lots of trees and lots of children outside playing.” (Page 15) //
- my thoughts: False sense of security.
-
[I] Skipped: “no different from thousands of other towns” (Page 15) //
✅ notes pulled! // Page 16.
- [i] Timothy Morton (2013) has thus described ours as the Age of Asymmetry. What he means by this is that we have suddenly entered an epoch where the gap between appearances and realities has grown to the point that we no longer understand the world of the senses as the real world, but rather as a cover over another world of depths that we can fathom with science. That is to say that our lives are more and more oriented around responding to dimensions of reality that do not form part of Nature, at least insofar as Nature corresponds to the world of our situated senses and ordinary perception (Page 16)
-
[i] Skipped: the Age of Asymmetry (Page 16)
-
[I] Skipped: …the changes in the seasons and the normal variability of weather in any particular location. Yet global climate is not something that we can see, and we indeed have a very difficult time placing ourselves, and placing where we find ourselves within global climate change. It is too weird, too dissonant with our perceptions, not to feel lost when acknowledging that the incredible volume of snow that fell on the East Coast of the United States during the winter of 2013-14 was a function of global warming. Climate change, to be precise, is a black box phenomenon in that our access to it is mediated through complicated computer models, like so much of science, according to Bruno Latour. (Page 16) //
-
[I] Skipped: The Age of Asymmetry comes after the end of the world. That is to say that we who live in the Anthropocene no longer find ourselves capable of believing in the innocence of the sensual world that surrounds us. Our world has become weird, our reality horrifying. (Page 16) //
- my thoughts: jaded by cosmic horror
-
[I] Skipped: We are too aware that the apparent nothing that comes out of our cars when we start them is accumulating in infinitely minute particles in the atmosphere. Unlike the soot and smog that threatened our major cities as far back as the 19th century, prompting cries of alarm from William Blake and other Romantic Poets, carbon dioxide is invisible. We cannot see the upwards of 400 ppm of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gasses that currently exist in our atmosphere. Nor can we situate this pollution, for the global climate is just as threatened by those invisible particles in the most pristine regions of the Canadian North as it is in the visibly smoggy streets of Shanghai. Yet even where air pollution is concerned, weirder, deeper realities intrude into our awareness. According to scientists, it is not the larger, visible pollutants that are the most carcinogenic, but rather the infinitesimally small nanoparticles. Thus our cities may seem to be visibly less polluted than in the past, but they may actually be just as dangerous to our health while simultaneously seeming cleaner. A similar worldshattering tension between apparent health and purity versus death-dealing reality is present in many ordinary household objects. Consider the case of BPA, a form of plastic widely used in the 20th century for the fabrication of items such as baby bottle nipples. Originally considered ideal for this application because of its translucency (a signal of purity according to our senses), this material was later discovered to be a potent endocrine disruptor (Cicolella 1963). Today, tests show that 93 % of the population have traces of BPA in their systems, and because of this our societies are seeing an augmentation of the number cases of breast and prostate cancer, a decline of male sperm quality, early pubescence in girls, metabolic disorders such as diabetes and obesity, and behavioral disorders such as hyperactivity and ADHD. (Page 16-17) //
- my thoughts: “translucency” → A great example of how the invisible threats posed in cosmic horror lead us to gradually trust and rely on our senses & faculties because they are deceptive in this weird world
✅ notes pulled! // Page 17
- [I] Living in the Anthropocene implies that we are no longer at home, or that our home is no longer comfortable but filled with terrors and depths that are perhaps best captured by the metaphysics of the weird that we have uncovered in our explorations of weird fiction. Living in the Anthropocene implies not only that we are aware that the world has dimensions that exceed the grasp of our senses, but also that there are dimensions or depths to the real that exist beyond even those of science
- my thoughts: the ULTIMATE mind fuck
- weird writing is always in the end naturalized, and that is to say retuned to the world of reason, order, and anthropomorphically ordered representations, if only in the inverted sense of presenting us with the supernatural. Doubtless the supernatural is no more the real than the Natural, and perhaps the problem with horror is that it may tend to produce a kind of paralysis and existential nihilism within its readers, in the way that a blood-curdling scream can freeze us in our tracks. (Page 17) //
- my thoughts: To describe/experience “the weird” as we perceive, it would inherently violate our understanding of it — we cannot truly articulate this world, we can only attempt to communicate in the ways we (already) know how
- [I] (Partially) Skipped: The horror of the Anthropocene and the real of weird realism remind us of the inutility of trying to naively suture together the real and the Natural (Page 17) //
- my thoughts: futility
- [I] The weird expressionism of horror, in its striving to express the unnamable while leaving it dark, at least leads us towards a real appreciation of the difficulty of thinking and representing places (Page 17) //
- [*] we only blindly touch upon the real look for the overlooked (and not just to look at the overlooked). Re-encountering familiar scenes after having read horror is to see these scenes with heightened senses, straining for sight beyond sight. Thus the weird hardly leads us away from the places in which we dwell. On the contrary, it brings us back to them with x-ray attentiveness and extraordinary humility. (Page 17) //
- my thoughts: BOOM!!!